Join the Sonar-Global network
Registration for Individual Members
Registration for Consortia
What we do?
Submit COVID-19 Project
South East Asian Hub
Eastern European Hub
West and Central African Hub
Vulnerability assessments reports in 5 EU countries
The Rapid Assessment of Vulnerable Populations
SPECIAL SOC EPIDEMICS curriculum
OPERATE SOC EPIDEMICS curriculum
SPECIAL SOC AMR curriculum
OPERATE SOC AMR curriculum
MOOC on AMR: The Social Dimensions of AMR
EPICAST – The Sonar-Global Podcast
Training Curricula Database
AMR Curriculum Case Studies
Readings & Audiovisual
Share your story
Readings & Audiovisual
Filter by type
Podcasts & audio
Filter by topic
Filter by topic:
A Spectrum of (Dis)Belief: Coronavirus Frames in a Rural Midwestern Town in the United States.
Community responses to the SARS-CoV-2, or “coronavirus” outbreaks of 2020 reveal a great deal about society. In the absence of government mandates, debates over issues such as mask mandates and social distancing activated conflicting moral beliefs, dividing communities. Policy scholars argue that such controversies represent fundamental frame conflicts, which arise from incommensurable worldviews, such as contested notions of “liberty” versus “equity”. This article investigates frames people constructed to make sense of coronavirus and how this affected social behavior in 2020.
How Political Cultures Produce Different Antibiotic Policies in Agriculture: A Historical Comparative Case Study between the United Kingdom and Sweden
The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of how different countries formulate and regulate antibiotic use in animals raised for human consumption. A comparative case study was undertaken, analysing historical documents from the 1950s to the 1990s from the UK, the first country to produce a scientific report on the public health risks of agricultural antibiotic use; and Sweden, the first country to produce legislation on the growth promotor use of antibiotics in food animals. Sheila Jasanoff's concepts of ‘co‐production’ and ‘political cultures’ have been used to explore how both countries used different styles of scientific reasoning and justification of the risks of agricultural antibiotic use. It will be argued that national dynamics between policy, science and public knowledges co‐produced different risk classifications and patterns of agricultural antibiotic use between both countries. UK's political culture used ‘expert committees’ to remove the issue from public debate and to inform agricultural antibiotic policies. In contrast, the Swedish ‘consensus‐oriented’ political culture made concerns related to agricultural antibiotic use into a cooperative debate that included multiple discourses. Understanding how national policies, science and public knowledges interact with the risks related to agricultural antibiotic use can provide valuable insights in understanding and addressing countries agricultural use of antibiotics.
A note on language
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No
© The Sonar-Global Project, 2019-2022. Graphics for this website have kindly been provided by Sonar-Global partners. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be used, reproduced and/or disclosed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the Sonar-Global project partners.
Data Protection & Privacy rules